An Example -- May the "Dis-Honorable" Judge Ian Rivamonte help bring all of this into view...
Embedded Files
So, how might the "oversight of the SEI 700 Filers" play out to the negative benefit of a county? There's a lot more to the story below than what will be revealed here, but this makes for an interesting and relevant start.
Attorney Ian Rivamonte was seemingly a nobody in law.
He toiled in a practice for almost two decades doing the same thing with asbestos lawsuits over and over again, or so it seems today.
Then, one day, out of no where, he was appointed to be a Monterey County Judge, while living in Santa Clara County, by the California "Gubernor Gavin Newscome" (aka King Bulan)
How does a Pilipino Attorney with no breadth of experience worthy of a Black Robe get "appointed" to a judgeship in a county he doesn't live in, and one that that is supposed to "elect" their own judges from their own community?
Did a Pilipino AG who is caught up in his own scandals get an unworthy Pilipino Attorney appointed as a Judge in a County he didn't live in?
Could the system really be that far off the mark now?
Did someone confuse California with Olde Khazaria? Cali-Khazaria has a ring, and this sure fits it.
SEI 700 Form - Rivamonte's 2023 assuming office - 8 Pages
SEI 700 Form - Rivamonte's 2023 assuming office - 8 Pages
This is the SEI 700 form Rivamonte filed upon taking office after an appointment by a foreign Governor and no election by the people of Monterey County. NOTE: There should be NO redactions on a Public Document. This was done by the FPPC improperly but ignore that for now. That's minor compared to the rest at this point in time...
For starters, this form should (theoretically) go to the Monterey County Clerk given they are to be an County elected official and the County would be their "Jurisdiction" -- but instead it only went to the Fair Practices Commission (as is evident by the stamp).
Then there's the check on the "judges" box that makes them a "state jurisdiction" (while still being county elected officials). Does that make any sense? Because they are a state filer, is that what allows them to live outside of a county and still get a job -- because technically they are living in their "jurisdiction" even though it's not the "jurisdiction" they are judging for? Terribly improper to say the least.
Third, this document should have been rejected due to a lack of page count. The most critical item to a Conscientious Clerk is page count. Without that, they and others could never know if all that was intended to be disclosed was disclosed.
Fourth, as mentioned prior the redactions are woefully improper for a public document.
From where do these Attorneys at the FPPC feel they have the right to be so sloppy while applying illogical rules and conceal public information for a "st-ounty"?
It's like they are all inverted?
The rest of Rivamonte's form seems as if he may have made "proper disclosures" (albeit we have NO CLUE if he owns property on Pedo-file island or elswhere, since he's not a resident anyone could have vouched for. However, it seems clear he may not have read the Swiss Cheese directions given he does seem to disclose his primary residence too (which was in another county). So, if a Judge was honest -- and not hiding a plot on Pedo-file island or a chalet in Count Dracula's compound -- this is reasonable for what one might expect of a "Licensed Attorney" improperly impostering a locally elected Judge.
(No need to look at the details in detail right now, but they will make for good education for auditors later).
SEI 700 Form - Rivamonte's 2023 year end - 1 Page
SEI 700 Form - Rivamonte's 2023 year end - 1 Page
It's here, just a year later where the systemic problems arise.
This report is supposed to cover the time from his assuming office date of 4/18/2023 until 12/31/2023.
You remember all that stuff he owned and disclosed above?
It's now ALL GONE. Every last drop of it.
This time he uses the state sponsored "e-file system" instead of filing by hand.
He indicated he only had a 1 page document to file and he selected "None" , stating he had no Assets or potential confilcts of interest to disclose.
So, how does a guy go from acting "generally proper" and seemingly "transparent" to fully opaque in an 8 month period of time?
We can only presume as of now somebody spoke with him after his first filing and told him he need not disclose anything due to 1) loopholes that all fit him perfectly or 2) the promise of no oversight or major penalties for a lack of disclosure or 3) a combination of the above or something else.
How does this make you feel?
How does this make you feel?
SEI 700 Form Information
SEI 700 Form Introduction
SEI stands for "Statement of Economic Interest"
The number 700 is an arbitrary form number assigned by the State of California .
We'll refer to this form at all times as the "SEI 700 Form". You may see the state, county and others refer to it as Form 700. Do not adopt that. We always want "SEI 700 form" so we are always reminded the form is about "Statements of Economic Interest" (SEI).
The form has a cover page much like you might imagine for a Legal Document declaring all Economic Interests (name, address, job title, time period for the form, checkboxes for the schedules (A trhough E) to be included with the filing, and a Legal Verification Block).
The Schedules A through E include things like Stocks/Investments, Businesses/Trusts, Real Estate, Employment income streams, and Gifts. They are detailed.
The SEI 700 form asks for income and asset information that far exceeds a tax return. It is "the document" that was designed to keep kleptocrats , oligarchs , and individuals with shady financial background out of easy reach of public coffers or the creation and manipulation of laws, codes and policies for self-dealing and private network dealing.
This website represents the head of a new, decentralized media pyramid that will oversee/do the job of and/or preplace the State Appointed Officials and Employees -- County Elected officials and employees who have just been exposed for not doing their job. It will also discredit every current main stream media outlet system in CA for the same (print, video, radio, online).
This is an opportunity to create an entirly new media pyramid that puts public interest and public trust over advertising revenues, nepotism, legal lobby interests, cartel interests and all other lesser interests that have consumed California to its breaking point.
More information coming soon.
Page updated
Report abuse